Skip to main content

Pricing Strategy

 The 4 P's of marketing are Product, Place, Price, and Promotion. The 5th P is People. Now, legal services are about all these 5 P's but most important one is "Price". 

There are different pricing strategies in general. Most common among them are:

1. Cost-plus pricing - your selling price is based on the costs involved and margin of profitability involved. 

2. Competitive pricing - your selling price is based on the selling price set by your competitors. 

3. Value-based pricing - your selling price is based on the worth or value being provided to customer.

Now, there are different pricing strategies for legal services. It is not called selling price but fee or charges. 

1. Hourly Fee - the fee is based on the number of hours spent by the attorney (or attorneys) to complete the matter and provide deliverable. 

2. Flat Fee - the is fixed or set, irrespective of the number of hours spent to complete the matter and provide deliverable. 

3. Retainer Fee - the fee is fixed on a monthly basis. 

4. Mixed Fee - the fee is a mix of discounts, hourly fee, flat fee, deliverable based fee, etc. 

5. Contingency Fee - as the name says, the fee is dependent upon certain condition, for e.g., a positive outcome will be charged at 10%. 

However, the customer is getting price sensitive and wants to pay less money for the same quality work. Typically, in legal space, customer or client works with multiple law firms to hedge the risk. It is same like not putting all eggs in one basket. This also provides the client to observe how different firms are providing the services and at what cost. The emphasis here is "how" because the "what" is categorized between "commodity deliverables" and "value deliverables".  

This coupled with the inflation, bonus, salaries, operating costs, and competition with other law firms puts an enormous pressure on the law firms. Yes, educating the attorneys, involving them in decisions make sense but end of the year appraisal discussions do not play happy tunes. 

This is where the legal tech can help as below for developing pricing strategy:

1. Analyzing when "value deliverables" become "commodity deliverables". 

For e.g., once a query has been replied after conducting through research, reply to similar queries become "commodity deliverables". The first query can be charged at hourly fee while the next ones at flat rates. 

However, this can be tricky wherein clients ask query only if the same is answered at no cost. 

2. Analyzing which client is often asking for free work or at discounted work. 

Answering the question whether to work at any price or whether to work not below than a certain price is crucial. 

3. Analyzing if tiered pricing makes sense.

Giving different rates every time is a headache and justifying those rates during invoicing is migraine. Having tiered pricing and tiered discounting structure for the type of client can make a difference between peaceful dealing and haggling. 

The legal tech solution captures all the relevant details and provides the above analytics. Hence, it is crucial for a law firm to understand and define what is the requirement and then dosing or obtain a corresponding solution and not the other way around. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Off the Shelf or Custom Made Software for Law Firms

When talking about having different software solutions for daily operations in law firms, there is one major bone of contention that needs to be addressed first. That contention is whether to have the software custom made (often interchangeably referred to as bespoke or tailor made) or to buy an off the shelf (already made and marketed) software. It is a tough decision to make as there are lot of good off the shelf software solutions or products available in market. In a law firm, there are different requirements and for each one of them typically more than one software solution is required. Examples include, but not limited to, practice management system for managing contacts, calendars, client communication, cases, documents, and billing; docket management and/or IP management system for managing IP due dates; billing, vendor payments, and reconciliation solution for managing income and expenses; proof reading solution, e-discovery solution, contract drafting solution,...

Document Management & Knowledge Management

Everyone today at law firms or legal departments now talk about document management (DM) and knowledge management (KM). These words are often used separately but they are inexplicably tied with each other and yet have subtle differences between each other. By definition of services provided by law firms or work done by legal departments, there is an explicable amount of documents that gets generated. From multiple draft versions being shared with clients or vendors to final versions being filed officially; from queries to questionnaires to articles. Lots of content being generated and stored without much understanding of DM and KM. Or to put in much clear words, w ithout much understanding of structured content and unstructured content. And the question is are the law firms or legal departments putting that much effort to understand the difference? A search about difference between DM and KM yields a lot of results that help in understanding - from brief to detailed - about w...

IT Training for & in Law Firms

Recently I read an article about IT training for lawyers by Neil Cameron . The article provided great insights into how much IT training is lacking in law firms. Not only about specific workflow solutions such as case management, time management, and billing management but even about normal Microsoft solutions such as word, excel, and power point. Neil has pointed out many examples and has also provided a solution and many ways to implement the same,i.e., training users in a law firm. In simple terms what is the phrase "IT training for Law Firms" means? IT training encompasses training on all IT products from simple tools like word, excel to complex tools like case management and modelling tools (e.g.,Visio) for each and every user, irrespective of their level in the law firm. But the point is even management at law firms is not willing enough to provide specific training to its users? The answer is a bold 'NO'. Unfortunately, law firms are more interested in onl...